Argument, Inquiry and Political Narrative: Navigating an Aesthetics of Database Documentary
This collection and linkage of media objects and texts is a reflection on the form and content of two database-driven new media documentaries, Public Secrets and Blood Sugar, which provide interactive interfaces to online audio archives of conversations recorded with incarcerated women and injection drug users. These are the first two works in a series designed to allow socio-economically marginalized individuals to testify to the social and economic injustices they experience in the context of a broad spectrum of public institutions – the criminal justice system, the prison industrial complex, the public health system, and the public education system. In this online publication Public Secrets and Blood Sugar serve as case-studies of how interface design constitutes a form of “argument,” (as writing does for a scholar), and user navigation functions as a form of “inquiry” (a distillation and translation of the research encounter of the Documentary-maker). Through anecdote, annotation, narration and analysis the author of these texts (and the original works they examine) considers the political potential of database documentary as well as the tensions and contradictions that emerge at the intersection of theory, aesthetics, advocacy and activism.
Daniel, S. (2014) “Argument, Inquiry and Political Narrative: Navigating an Aesthetics of Database Documentary”. In: in Soar, M. & Gagnon, M. (eds) Database | Narrative | Archive Montreal, Canada,
Categories: Interactive Essay
Tags: advocacy / database / interactivity